SCO 1993 explained in simple form

SCO 1993 explained in simple form

This video does a great job explaining SCO 1993.  Kim Elgee lays out the impacts and illegal nature of SCO 1993.  Thank you Kim for such a great video.  More people should be aware of this and the impacts.  I have copied her statement word for word because she did such a good job.   Kudo Kim Alaska Constitution Article 1, Section 8 Alaska grand jurors’ independent rights SHALL NEVER BE SUSPENDED Five Supreme Court Justices pushed through court order 1993 without going through the rules committee, without public input. Did anyone else think as to why they left the Alaska…
The background of Margaret Murphy

The background of Margaret Murphy

Margaret Murphy went to school at Valaparaiso University in Indiana. The American Bar Association accredited this university in 1929.  The bar association also "censured the school for admitting applicants who did not appear capable of satisfactorily completing the school's program of legal education and being admitted to the bar (Wikipedia).  Located in Indiana just south of Chicago this school has a history of enrolling students with poor education capabilities.  In 2020 Valaparaiso University was shut down.  Margaret Murphy worked as a school librarian and a paralegal while attending this school (1985-1987).  This school was home to the youngest woman to…
Stand up against corruption

Stand up against corruption

Co authored by David Haeg Liberty Protect our liberty and stand up against corruption. On August 11th, we ask you to join us in a peaceful sit- in at the Kenai Alaska courthouse at 945 AM at Judge Margaret Murphy's pretrial hearing.  AGJA seeks independent investigations into allegations of systemic corruption within our judicial system. Criminal Rule 6.1 The Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly has already passed a resolution calling for the Alaska Legislature to investigate citizen concerns. We urge our elected officials to carefully consider and independently verify the facts presented.  We are requesting an investigation with the power to…
Grand Jury Investigation something we have a Constitutional right to

Grand Jury Investigation something we have a Constitutional right to

https://alaskagrandjurorsassociation.org/2023/05/04/re-legislative-grand-jury-investigation-we-are-requesting-investigation-by-alaskas-legislature-join-in-the-upcoming-courthouse-sit-in-on-april-19th/?mtm_campaign=AGJA%3A%20Group%20Blast&mtm_group=Talkeetna%252c%2BAK%2BCommunity%2BNews&mtm_source=David%20Haeg&mtm_medium=Facebook
To honor Hoonah Tribal Councils Resolution #23-25

Hoonah Resolution #23-25 judicial failure in Thomas Mack case

Resolution #23-25 HIA Resolution - 2023 The Hoonah Indian Association makes some very good points in RESOLUTION #23-25 Resolution of Support for Thomas Jack. You should read up on this case.  The Native communities are unrepresented in the judicial system.  Governor Dunleavy has failed to recognize or act on this.  Tribal Council findings represent the facts.  A court stacked against Thomas Mack- that being an all white court is not justice.  Native neighbors ethnic rights in the judiciary system harms Alaska.  It devalues their freedoms by placing them in jeopardy of dealing with a stacked deck.  It would seem our…
Arraignment of Judge Murphy

Arraignment of Judge Murphy

What is Arraignment? An arraignment is the first step in a criminal proceeding. This is where the defendant is brought in front of the court to hear the charges against them and enter a plea. An arraignment can be viewed as a pre-trial. Some states will require an arraignment for misdemeanor cases or felony cases. Other states only require an arraignment for felony cases. During an arraignment, in front of a judge the charges will be read to the defendant. The defendant will also be read their rights.  (https://herlawyer.com/arraignment-vs-indictment/) On June 23rd , 2023 ex Judge Margaret Murphy was arraigned at…
Judge arraigned in Kenai for Perjury

Judge arraigned in Kenai for Perjury

On June 23rd 53 people drove from all over Alaska to attend the arraignment of ex-judge Margaret Murphy for perjury.  This indictment is the result of a grand jury convened under the Alaska State Constitution.  Under the Alaska Constitution people have the right to question the courts and other agencies for faulty processes and corruption.  All elected officials need to be accountable. People from as far away as Talkeetna drove to listen to a hearing that lasted approximately 12 minutes.  The courtroom was rightfully packed with people wanting to witness that a judge caught lying was being held accountable. Perjury under…
Unelected Judges and Attorney Generals repeatedly HIJACK Grand Jury Investigations.

Unelected Judges and Attorney Generals repeatedly HIJACK Grand Jury Investigations.

In  December, David Ignell wrote an article outlining how Alaska’s unelected judges and attorney generals have repeatedly highjacked grand jury investigations into the Office of Children Services.  https://mustreadalaska.com/david-ignell-a-human-tragedy-caused-by-ocs/ Every family in Alaska needs to be paying attention to agency's that need this grand juror investigation and oversight.  Families cannot continue to be deprived of safety, happiness and the right to due process simply because they are too poor to afford themselves competent representation by good legal counsel.  I think all of you will agree that OCS is just one example of needing an investigation.  Judge Margaret Murphy was arraigned on…
Alaska Constitution Article I § 8

Alaska Constitution Article I § 8

State of Alaska Constitution Article I § 8. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the armed forces in time of war or public danger. Indictment may be waived by the accused. In that case the prosecution shall be by information. The grand jury shall consist of at least twelve citizens, a majority of whom concurring may return an indictment. The power of grand juries to investigate and make recommendations concerning the public welfare or safety shall never…
PAC derails Justice

PAC’s and the impact our courts have on elections

Worried about institutional corruption?  You should be.  Here is yet another example of corruption by elected officials through the influence of courts which will not allow the hobbling of super PACs.   The legal precedent for super PACs Many people believe that the US Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allowed corporations to spend money directly in elections, compels this result. But Citizens United, bad as it was, didn't say anything about super PACs. Instead, starting a few months after the Citizens United decision, a handful of lower courts, based on an unfortunate misunderstanding of Citizens United, decided that the Constitution…